Investigator- and Patient-Rated Local Tolerability in Phase 3 Trials of Topical Roflumilast in Patients With Psoriasis, Seborrheic Dermatitis, and Atopic Dermatitis

Main Article Content

Christopher Bunick
Neal Bhatia
James Del Rosso
Zoe Draelos
Lawrence Eichenfield
Leon Kircik
Mark Lebwohl
Melinda Gooderham
Lawrence Green
Adelaide Hebert
Ronald Vender
Matthew Zirwas
Eric Simpson
Linda Stein Gold
Melissa Seal
Scott Snyder
David Osborne
Patrick Burnett
Robert Higham
David Chu
David Berk

Keywords

roflumilast cream, roflumilast foam, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, local tolerability

Abstract

Investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability in phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast in patients with psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis


 


Christopher G. Bunick1 on behalf of the authors


 


INTRODUCTION: Formulating a topical medication that does not irritate the skin is an important factor contributing to patient treatment adherence and satisfaction. Many topical prescription products use penetration enhancers (including propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and ethanol) to overcome barrier properties of the skin. However, these excipients may irritate the skin causing tolerability reactions such as burning and stinging, which can reduce patient treatment adherence. Topical roflumilast is a highly potent (Kd~0.7 nM) phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor formulated as a water-based cream or foam that does not contain penetration enhancers or fragrances. We present prospectively assessed investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability from Phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast for patients with psoriasis (DERMIS-1, DERMIS-2, ARRECTOR) seborrheic dermatitis (SD; STRATUM), and atopic dermatitis (AD; INTEGUMENT-1, INTEGUMENT-2).


METHODS: Patients were randomized to apply topical roflumilast (DERMIS: 0.3% cream; ARRECTOR and STRATUM: 0.3% foam; INTEGUMENT: 0.15% cream) or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (DERMIS, ARRECTOR, and STRATUM) or 4 weeks (INTEGUMENT). Investigators assessed local tolerability on an 8-point scale (0 [no evidence of irritation] to 7 [strong reaction spreading beyond application site]) in the clinic before investigational product (IP) application. Patients reported local tolerability on a 4-point scale (0 [none: no sensation] to 3 [severe: hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort]) in the clinic 10-15 minutes after IP application. Tolerability was also assessed by reviewing documented adverse events.


RESULTS: As assessed by investigators, ≥96.5% of patients in the roflumilast-treated groups had no evidence of irritation at the application site across all trials at all timepoints. Patient-rated local tolerability was favorable and improved with treatment: across all trials, 1% of roflumilast-treated patients reported a score of 3 (severe; defined as a “hot tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort”) after the first application (day 1) and <1% at each subsequent assessment. Rates of adverse events, including those at the application site, were low for all trials and <0.5% of roflumilast-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events at the application site across all trials.


CONCLUSION: Roflumilast cream and foam formulations demonstrated favorable local tolerability based on investigator- and patient-rated assessments in patients with psoriasis, SD, and AD, including application to sensitive areas such as the face and intertriginous areas.


Sponsored by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.


ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: DERMIS-1: NCT04211363; DERMIS-2: NCT04211389; ARRECTOR: NCT05028582; STRATUM: NCT04973228; INTEGUMENT-1: NCT04773587; INTEGUMENT-2: NCT04773600

References

1. Eastman WJ, et al. Cutis 2014;94:46–53.

2. Danby SG, et al. J Dermatolog Treat 2022;33:685–698.

3. Lessmann H, et al. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:247–259.

4. Zirwas MJ, et al. JAMA Dermatol 2023;159:613–620.

5. ZORYVE (roflumilast) cream prescribing information. Westlake Village, CA: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc; July, 2022.

6. Lebwohl MG, et al. JAMA 2022;328:1073–1084.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>