Expected Spesolimab Plasma Exposure following Intravenous and Subcutaneous Dosing in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Main Article Content
Keywords
PK, intravenous and subcutaneous dosing, spesolimab, Generalized Pustular Psoriosis
Abstract
Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, potentially life-threatening inflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab is a first-in-class anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody approved to treat GPP flares in adults via intravenous (IV) infusion. The aim of this study was to simulate the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV versus subcutaneous (SC) doses of spesolimab to compare drug exposure profiles and support dosing strategies in patients with GPP.
Methods: A population PK model was developed using individual-level PK, anti-drug antibody, and covariate data from eighteen studies in which subjects were treated with IV or SC spesolimab.1 The resulting PK model was used to simulate concentration-time profiles following varying doses of IV and SC spesolimab. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax), and area under the curve (AUC) were summarized for each dose regimen.
Results: Simulated spesolimab exposures demonstrated that the Cmax and AUC of the single dose 900 mg IV infusion consistently exceeded that of various single doses of SC spesolimab tested. A SC dose greater than two-fold higher would be required to attain a Cmax comparable to that of spesolimab 900 mg IV. The difference in exposure between the two administration routes was most pronounced in the first 2 weeks after administration. Slow absorption is expected with SC injection, with Tmax attained at later time points after SC dosing compared to immediately following the 90-minute infusion for IV dosing. Results were the same when simulating a two-dose regimen administered one week apart.
Conclusions: PK simulations suggest that treatment with IV and SC spesolimab can result in differences in drug exposure in clinical practice. The immediate and high exposure of IV spesolimab compared with the lower exposure of SC spesolimab are supportive of IV dosing with spesolimab in acute GPP flare treatment vs SC dosing.
References
2. Boehringer Ingelheim. Data on File: Modeling and simulation report: population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of spesolimab in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. 2023;c41839684-01
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY): lets others distribute and copy the article, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honor or reputation.
Authors retain copyright in their work and license the publisher to publish the content. The publisher is the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, with production and publishing support provided by OJS, Open Journal Systems,see https://pkp.sfu.
Prior to January 2022, authors transferred copyright to the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. However, all articles are freely available to anyone in the world. There are no subscription fees, page charges, or article processing charges.